There is a simple formula for success that the respective coaches of the final 4 teams have mastered. Though each team has their own individual style and tempo, all of the teams have similar personnel. Kansas, North Carolina, Memphis, and UCLA each have a star point guard, several athletic wing players who can shoot from the perimeter, and a stable of big men that can rebound the ball and finish around the basket. Each of these teams has a fair amount of experience as well. It’s a simple formula for success and it starts with recruiting…
The star players in the final 4 include Tyler Hansbrough, Ty Lawson, and Wayne Ellington from North Carolina, Kevin Love and Darren Collison from UCLA, Derrick Rose and Chris Douglas Roberts of Memphis, and Darrell Arthur, Brandon Rush and Mario Chalmers of Kansas. Shockingly, all of these players were rated as a 4 or 5 star player (out of 5 stars) by rivals.com, a scouting service, coming out of high school. It goes beyond just having a few star players who were regarded this highly coming out of high school.
Consider Memphis’s roster, perhaps the most athletic team in the final 4. Derrick Rose…5 star. Chris Douglas-Roberts, Robert Dozier, Antonio Anderson, Doneal Mack…4 stars. The teams 5 leading scorers were all highly regarded before ever playing a game Memphis. As we break down Memphis we find a star point guard in Rose, several athletic wing players that can shoot the ball in Douglas-Roberts, Mack, Anderson, Andre Allen, and Jeff Robinson, and a strong athletic frontline that can run the up-tempo offense the Tigers run in Robert Dozier, Joey Dorsey, and Sean Taggart. Throw in the experience of having gone to back to back elite eight’s, and what do all the ingredients of this formula equal? They equal a very good basketball team heading to the final 4. Success.
Now lets breakdown the Tar Heels roster. Since arriving in Chapel Hill four years ago, Roy Williams has signed just two players ranked under 4 stars, Will Graves, a local player, and Quentin Thomas. This is quite an amazing feat. Apparently Roy is a likeable guy. His recruiting reminds me of what is happening at Kentucky right now, where Billy Gillispie signed Patrick Patterson and Alex Legion for his first year in Lexington, a five star and four star respectfully. He then followed that up with the signings of Deandre Liggins, a five star point guard, and Darius Miller and Kevin Galloway, 2 four star wings. Billy and Roy seem to have a grudge against those players ranked under 4 stars. One would imagine big things will happen in Lexington soon. Back to the Heels, they have a star point guard in Ty Lawson, several wings who can shoot and slash in Ellington, Ginyard, Green, and Graves, and one of the best frontcourt stables in the tournament which includes All American Tyler Hansbrough, Deon Thompson, and Alex Stepheson. Mix these ingredients together, and VUALA!… another team destined for success.
As for the Jayhawks, they too have their fair share of talent. They have more than just one star point guard. Sheron Collins and Mario Chalmers both share the lead guard duties for Kansas. Both 5 stars out of high school. Brandon Rush and Russell Robinson serve as the perimeter threats for KU, both 5 stars yet again. Their front court is in my opinion the best in this final 4. Sophomore Darrell Arthur, yet another five star, teams up with seniors Sasha Kahn and Darnell Jackson, and freshman Cole Aldrich, who are the only players who were not five stars to get playing time for the Jayhawks, and they were all 4 stars! These front court players are long, strong, and can play basketball. The Jayhawks had some extra motivation on the side due to the bitter taste left in their mouth after losing to UCLA in last year’s elite eight. Once again stir the pot and we get a stew of success.
Rounding out the final 4 is the UCLA bruins. On paper this may actually be the least talented team in this final 4, despite having gone to the final four each of the last two seasons returning almost all of their players, and adding 5 star freshman All American Kevin Love. The one thing they have on the other teams is that experience. They too have a star point guard in All American Darren Collison. Josh Shipp and Russell Westbrook man the two and three spots. Both can shoot the ball, drive, and play great defense. Freshman star Kevin Love, Luc Richard Mbah a Moute, Alfred Aboya, and Lorenzo Mata-Real run a four man frontcourt rotation that rivals the Jayhawks or Tarheels in terms of depth and quality. Love is one of the toughest individual match ups in the final four as he is very tough to stop on the block, and can shoot the three on top of that. What did rivals rate these players in high school you ask? Well, each of these players was a four star, except for Mbah a Moute a three star, and Love a 5 star. Coincidence that they reach the final four with this kind of talent? I think not. A 3rd consecutive final 4 would have to qualify as a success.
It’s a simple formula. Recruit four and five star athletic players that can play basketball at each position and you will have a great team that can reach the final 4. Some of you may be thinking about Davidson and the elite eight run they made with no player rated higher than a three star out of high school, including Stephen Curry. Recruiting rankings do not mean everything. A team with a high basketball IQ that can shoot the ball can beat the Goliaths of college basketball as the wildcats proved, beating Gonzaga, Georgetown, and Wisconsin, 7, 2, and 3 seeds respectfully, but more often than not the team with the more talent and athleticism will win the game. Kansas played a poor game, shooting just 44% from the field, and turning the ball over 4 more times than Davidson. Even though things weren’t going their way their defense clamped down and held the Fighting Curry’s to 38% shooting. This was a result of them being a more athletic and bigger team. Their talent was just too much to overcome though Davidson nearly pulled the upset off, as senior guard Jason Richards missed a three at the buzzer that would have won them the game.
Rivals and other scouting sites are not always correct in their assessments of players. 3 stars like Stephen Curry can end up playing like 5 stars should in college, while 5 stars like Malik Hairston of Oregon can end up playing below expectations. However, more often than not , the 4 and 5 star players will be good division 1 college players. Is it a coincidence that the teams in the final 4 are comprised of perhaps the more guards, forwards, and big men that were highly regarded players out high school, than almost any other colleges? Absolutely not. Although UCLA’s and Kansas’s trademarks are defense, Memphis’s is having extraordinary athletes, and North Carolina’s is having a great offense, it all comes down to the quality basketball players these teams have. Roy Williams, Bill Self, Ben Howland, and John Calipari can be credited for their personnel, much more than they can be credited for in game adjustments, though these do play a key role to a team’s success as well.
As for my picks for the final 4, I had to take into account the statistic that every championship team except for 2 over the last 20 years has averaged over 75 points per game over the course of the season, and had an average margin of victory in the double digits. The only team that doesn’t meet both of these standards is UCLA who averages 74 points per game. This makes me think the Bruins are the least likely to win this final 4, despite being one of the two media darlings this year along with North Carolina. Both semi-final games are 50-50 on paper, but I think the two teams being a bit overlooked, Kansas and Memphis will advance to the title game, with the Jayhawks winning a close one.





Related Articles
12 users responded in this post
I think another big factor has to be coaching. There are several examples each season of a team with great talent that underachieves and also a team with little talent that overachieves each season.
Looking at Duke over the past few seasons, they have certainly underachieved. With 7 McDonalds All-Americans on the roster, you’d think Coach K could advance to the sweet sixteen.
Also, as you mentioned, Davidson has proven that the big-time players aren’t completely necessary.
Overall, recruiting obviously plays a major role in each teams success and the teams that do it well are consistently in the top 25.
Yeah James, Davidson doesn’t have any star players (Stephen Curry)
I didn’t say anything about star players. Hell, UGA has a star player in Sundiata Gaines and they were 4-12 in the SEC.
When I said big-time players I was referring to highly recruited players like the article was talking about. Curry wasn’t a big-time player out of high school and certainly not highly recruited. Curry was only a 3 star and couldn’t even get an offer from Virginia Tech — where his father went and became the 15th overall pick in the NBA draft. Not many would have predicted his tournament eruption.
Yeah the whole article was on recruiting rankings and how teams turn out. My whole point was that the teams that get it done in recruiting will get it done on the court, and though there are diamond in the rough players like Curry, generally the recruiting rankings will be accurate and will estimate very well how well a team will be when the players arrive on campus. Talent is more important than a system or coaching, though both play some role.
ok, so you meant big time players out of high school.
Stephen Curry = $$$$
I think it is ridiculous to say the reason that duke has not gone far in the tournament is because of coach K. The reason is the players do not perform well at all during the tournament. One can make the argument that Duke was one of the best 3 teams during the regular season.
Sure, Coach K isn’t the only reason, he’s just the main one. Who gets the players to perform? The Coach. It’s his gameplan, his scouting and his motivational speech that effect player performance.
And you could make the argument Duke was one of the best three teams, you’d just be wrong.
You could also make the argument that Norfolk State was one of the top 3 teams in the country. And as James said you would be wrong. You could make that argument for any team. Come on now, Duke had no inside guy that could hold Shawn Bradley’s jock strap this year. Were you high when you decided Duke was a good team? They almost lost to Belmont…Belmont. The ACC was no better than the Socon this year, and Stephen Curry proved that the coaches in ACC territory are also bad judges of talent, like Coach K has been lately.
You are totally right i think coach K is a terrible recruiter, such as getting guys like Kyle Singler, John Scheyer,Demarcus Nelson and Gerald Henderson. They did very bad in the regular season……NOT. The players did not do well in the tournament and its not because of coach k. If it was then they would not have played well in the regular season.
Duke had a terrible out of conference schedule, and the ACC was the worst BCS conference in the nation this year. If they played in a decent conference, they would have had about 10 losses. Duke is the product of getting a lot of media attention, and having a greater home court advantage than anyone. That is why when they get on a neutral court, they are exposed as the average team they have become year in year out. They haven’t beaten a team higher than a 5 seed in the last 7 years…
Duke didn’t have that great of a regular season. They lost to Miami and Wake Forest, Clemson (lost in first round), Pitt (lost in second round). They beat an injured UNC team (congrats) and Wisconsin was overrated all season. Other than that, what’s on their resume? Basically, they cleaned up the nobodies in the ACC. Not too much to speak of.
Leave A Reply
Please Note: Comment moderation maybe active so there is no need to resubmit your comments